[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 09/10/10 17:41, tom wrote: > > On 09/10/10 14:49, Henry Bremridge wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 01:17:07PM +0100, Julian Hall wrote: >> >>> Can be useful for faxing if dealing with companies who insist on hard >>> copy with a signature. There are still some around. >>> >>> >> It is surprising how many companies accept fax signatures, given how easy >> it is to cut and paste a scanned signature. I also find amusing | sad >> when >> companies want a faxed signature but refuse to accept the same >> document as >> a pdf attached to an email. Or alternatively will accept a fax but >> will not >> accept a fax without a signature. >> > Believe it or not faxes constitute legal documents. If I was to fax you Interestingly in law a "signature" does not mean the same as it does regular usage. A letterhead, stamp, seal, thumb print, etc. can pass the legal definition. > a contract that is the equivalent of you receiving one in the post. > I say receiving because if I was to fax it to you and your fax machine > ran out of ink but didnt know it and gave me a receipt for the fax then > I can say I've sent it job done. Effectivly it's the equivalent of "recorded delivery".
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq