[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:22:33 +0000 Simon Waters <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Neil Williams wrote: > > > > I suspect there could be a drupal plugin to provide this information if > > anyone fancies exploring . . . > > Explored... > > Apparently the Drupal 6 way is to install the "Views" module and create > a "View" which creates SQL queries with a pointy clicky interface. > > I've had a quick play and .... > > http://www.dcglug.org.uk/members Thanks, Simon. Members may want to note that the view operates in two modes: Anonymous (i.e. not logged in) - you get the name and a photo, (if any). Authenticated (logged in) - you get a link to the member page where you can view stuff like how long the person has been a member, a link to their homepage (if set), their OpenID (if set) and a contact form from you to them, direct (which does not reveal their email address, just yours.) Regarding spammers, I do delete users without warning and without appeal upon discovering any unsuitable content and drupal does make it easy for admins to spot new content creation. If anyone on the list spots stuff before an admin spots it, then the "writers" in the group can delete that page and then an admin can delete the user. Accounts that look suspicious but which who do not create inappropriate content are probably trying to harvest email addresses or test the drupal installation. Admins can delete such accounts if there is evidence of such behaviour. Without moderating all new accounts I don't see how that can be changed - I believe moderation would harm regular members too much. Members should bear in mind that the old site wasn't any different in this respect - there were junk accounts there too. It was just that because the process was non-standard, there weren't quite as many. Equally a non-standard process meant that genuine users got too confused and some of the junk accounts were actually genuine members who were having problems negotiating the process. The drupal site at least allows far more people to be involved in the process - the old site relied on me fixing stuff because I was the only one who understood what the code was trying to do. ;-) Members are reminded that although there is authentication, content on any part of the website (other than your password and your email address) is not private. This, again, is no different to before. Once someone creates an account, they can view the site using that account - until they get bored or get deleted for doing something obvious. With drupal, any admin has the right to decide if ANY account is to be deleted. Admins do not generally give warnings about deletions and there is no right to appeal. Don't be tempted to create inappropriate content "as a joke" - it won't be seen as funny. See this page for details of who is an admin and who is a writer: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/organisation (Members who want "writer" privileges should contact an admin and discuss it.) -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpXVp6I3U8y4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html