[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] Online photo printing
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] Online photo printing
- From: "Michael Mortimore" <nospamformike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:06:35 -0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:to:subject :references:date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GTEn7DORBrMGvqPXHz+149yG+EFP8do3a75uB70TLNg=; b=lVWhDdVDh1TJefAIIa7OlHMhrjCMXJSW75egzSUovXqnXWqbmG+ftJORPC71nea9zl KZLjQ8BIUOfdUkVLdzoe+iYUSRULsxYNE0GhMyKynBT5kLdzdSVk1H6HEJMEqHfah83M 4QMQfmVqAV+4mrppYgdt9XV67+WJSh1AGPql0=
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:42:54 -0000, Adrian Midgley <amidgley@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Lasers are not good for most photographs.
Why not?
The ones at work seem to print photos better than inkjets I've used.
Admittedly there's probably an order of magnitude or 2 difference in price
so the statistical significance could be called into question.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html
