[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Anthony Lane wrote: > I do a lot of web design, and personally, I find that doing all the HTML > & CSS by hand is by far the easiest and least problematic method. The > trouble with many editors is that the code they spit out is not fully > cross browser compliant, and when you consider how many people are still > using IE6, this becomes a major issue. I have no interest in worrying about people who still use IE of whatever version. If they have problems with any site I set up then, as far as I am concerned, that is their problem for using such a poor browser. I have seen templates which make special provision for IE users with special slices of code. I will never bother. > Having said that, I've just been taking a look at Bluefish, which has > the feature to add html tags on click, but in my opinion, the most > important feature of any text editor is syntax highlighting. Gedit is > brilliant from this perspective. The highlighting makes mistakes and > typos very easy to spot and speeds up the development process no end. > > Good luck with your project > Anthony > Thanks for the good wishes. I am trying out bluefish at the moment. You are the second one to suggest gedit. As I use kubuntu I have installed kedit, so I will check that out too. I also believe that Kate editor is good with highlighting too. Neil Winchurst -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html