[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Tom Potts wrote: > But then once you've loaded a couple of programs... > The criticism was referring to like-for-like comparison. Like-for-like Windows 7 is faster than Vista. > Unless MS have completely re-invented their way of doing things. > Vista was to a large degree self harming with DRM but I bet 7 is heavily > stripped down Actually MS have done the same as Vista and released the Beta of the Ultimate edition, so not appreciably cut down. > and when you need a program to do something computational there > will be a few hefty DLL's to slow things down. That's true of all versions of Windows. My point was simply that the naked install of Windows 7 is much faster than the naked install of Vista, no more than that :) Kind regards, Julian -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html