[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 17/07/08 11:21:09, Alex Charrett wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Simon Waters wrote: > > > Has everyone ensured their recursive name servers are making good use of > > the ephemeral port range already? > > And that they're not behind a NAT device that means even patched > nameserers are vulnerable? > > http://blogs.iss.net/archive/dnsnat.html I run IPCop as my nat device, so it looks like I am OK! -- 'ooroo stinga...(:)-) --------------------------------------------------- Email: stinga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx o You need only two tools. o ///// A hammer and duct tape. If it /@ `\ /) ~ doesn't move and it should, > (O) X< ~ Fish!! use the hammer. If it moves and `\___/' \) ~ shouldn't, use the tape. \\\ --------------------------------------------------- -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html