[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Mark Evans wrote: > >> --- bbc.co.uk ping statistics --- >> 20 packets transmitted, 17 received, 15% packet loss, time 19166ms >> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 80.415/1565.696/3886.348/1272.494 ms, pipe 4 > > --- bbc.co.uk ping statistics --- > 20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19043ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1841.429/2927.215/4401.177/711.007 ms, pipe 5 > > Even without the packet loss the time taken is quite awful. Guess uncontended business bandwidth from them is better. --- bbc.co.uk ping statistics --- 20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19173ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.058/105.464/1144.053/253.871 ms, pipe 2 Our stats depend which server I use because we traffic shape, and some boxes are eating more than their allocated proportion of bandwidth. In which case I see worse stats pinging the local router, as it is the other side of the traffic shaper ;) Problems we see look more like when they introduced a content proxy into HTTP streams by mistake. When it works it is fine performance wise, otherwise the HTTP requests just hang. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html