[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Tom Potts wrote: > > But someone has to control the name it otherwise I (or another evil org) could > produce a version of Firefox that was pretty useless. It would be wrong to > call it Firefox but your saying that would be OK. No, Mozilla allow Debian to make changes and keep the name, and then reverted its stance. Sure, Debian could make a really bad version and distribute it in Debian, but I'm not sure what the point would be. Or Mozilla could have trusted Debian to do the decent thing.... Just folks was criticizing Debian for changing the name, and now you seem to be arguing they had to as well....
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html