[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] tax liability

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] tax liability
From: "Ben Goodger" <goodgerster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:45:19 +0100

On 12/09/2007, Michael Mortimore <nospamformike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thought so, so another argument for OSS.
Surely just an arguement for free (of the beer kind) software?

If you need a modification to OSS, you chuck your techies a tenner and they submit the patch.
If you need a modification to anything else, you are effectively stuck and it will at the very least take much more time.

--
Benjamin F. Goodger
~ design and ideas lab ~

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html

References:
- [LUG] tax liability
  - From: Paul Sutton
- Re: [LUG] tax liability
  - From: Steve Marvell
- Re: [LUG] tax liability
  - From: Paul Sutton
- Re: [LUG] tax liability
  - From: Michael Mortimore

Prev by Date: Re: [LUG] Dozing server
Next by Date: Re: [LUG] resume of plans and to do's for Penzance meetings
Previous by thread: Re: [LUG] tax liability
Next by thread: [LUG] Dont buy from PC World
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread