[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Friday 24 August 2007 21:35, Benjamin A'Lee wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:13:08PM +0100, Simon Waters wrote: > > I'm surprised that the monitoring isn't rather more vendor neutral, > > either a choke point firewall, or video tape, or some such. I suspect > > the court will get it's ear bashed by relevant commercial groups as well. > > It seems a little ridiculous that court-mandated software is so limited. > What would happen if he used a non-x86 machine? Does he have to pay for > the copy of Windows himself? Surely just requiring him to use Windows is > punishment enough, never mind the monitoring software. > > Ben I just wonder who he'd sue when the monitoring software gets compromised and his machine turns into a bot! Tom te tom te tom -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html