[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Again it sounds like a mis interpratation of the GPL, re Looking at the site they seem to be charging for the corporate version which has non gpl code in there, whie the normal version is fully gpl, I agree with simon it's not very clear, whats going on. Not sure if its the same type of situation with star office vs openoffice.org you pay for star office even though openoffice.org is free, but they share the same code base, I am not a lawyer so can't really comment effectivly, paul Ben Goodger wrote: > Hi > > On the dansguardian website it says that dansguardian is GPL licensed > for personal use, but downloading it from the website for any sort of > commercial purpose is prohibited. > > Am I correct in thinking that either this is a violation of the GPL > and that I need not pay commercially, or the Debian packages are > purely GPL licensed and I need not pay? > > If so, this guy has a screw loose - who the hell uses software > downloaded from the project website as opposed to the repos? > > -- > Ben Goodger > #391382 > --------------------- > > Mi admiras religiajn; ili estas fine ebliĝinta solvi la maljunegan > demandon "kiel oni povas vivi sencerbe?". > It is well-known that I am blunt and unsophisticated. It's largely > your fault if you object to this. -- http://www.zleap.net -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html