[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
>> Turns out, when building the machine, I'd re-used the ide cable that was >> in the case. It wasn't ATA/100 and the data was being corrupted as it >> was written. The install software was hiding, or not reporting, the >> errors so all appeared well. No write error occured during the install >> that was shown to me. >> > Thats interesting. Didn't it give you a warning message on the BIOS > saying that it was using a 40 conductor IDE cable rather than an 80 > conductor cable? Nope, or I'd probably have noticed it earlier. Luckily, by googling the exact error message took me to a site that said something like "If you're seeing this, chances are your ide cable is pants". It were right! > they're now getting within reach of the masses. I think my next upgrade > will be an X2 although I doubt it'll be a 4800+ (unless that is I win > the lottery or get a pay rise ;-) The most I've spent on a processor since a splurdged on a dx4-100, but this is for a cctv monitoring box that really takes a hammering on the cpu. (It'll be replacing a quad xeon 500 and a athlon 64/3000 hopefully - the bogomips for both machines work out about the same and I know the software works well with multi processors) Speaking of which, there might be a compaq 5500 quad xeon coming up very cheaply in the s devon area shortly if anyone's interested. Would suit deaf computer lover - it's a bit loud. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html