[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Ben Goodger wrote: > On 20/10/06, *Jonathan Roberts* <jonathan.roberts.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:jonathan.roberts.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Also, I'm not sure how many Debian users run Unstable/experimental (I > can't remember which) that Ubuntu is synced with; or maybe I'm the > only one sticking with testing? > > > Ubuntu is synced six-monthly with etch at the moment - I'm not sure > which of those it is, but I've a sneaking suspicion it's unstable. Debian Stable = Currently Sarge Debian Testing = Currently Etch Debian Unstable = Always Sid > > > Under the hood, maybe that's true, but on the surface they *are* > > different. Ubuntu has a different set of defaults, has its own > "look > > and feel", and let's be honest here, when dealing with the > majority of > > "newbies", the look and feel is likely to be one of the things that > > sells them. > > > Yes, but other than the look and feel there's no change, and absolutely > no need for a separate distro site. There's no such thing as Fedora Kore... I meant the differences between Debian and Ubuntu, not the differences between Ubuntu and @Unbuntu. Grant. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html