[LUG] Very definitely, certainly _not_ vaguely, OT: Scientology article (copyright)

["Ben Goodger" <goodgerster@xxxxxxxxx>]

Tom Potts <tompotts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Perhaps it would be interesting  to make a site that is a satire of the
scientology site and change the redirect to that - at first glance the
hackers may think they have still got your site hacked!
Tom te tom te tom

Ho hum - a good idea.

But what of the potential copyright implications this would entail? Could they have a decent case against me if I did that?
Should I just consider the palpably more legal route of herbicide and sucrose instead?* :P

-- 
Ben Goodger
#391382
---------------------

Mi admiras religiajn; ili estas fine ebliĝinta solvi la maljunegan demandon "kiel oni povas vivi sencerbe?".

*THIS IS 
NOT A BOMB THREAT**, MESSRS. BLUNKETT/CLARK/WHOEVER IT IS NOW AND BUSH. DO NOT SEND AN ARMED RESPONSE UNIT TO MY SUBURBAN HOME AND SHOOT ME FOR POLTICAL GAIN 
a la MINILUV/AFGHANISTAN/ETC.
-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html