[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 18:21, Simon Waters wrote: > Have you check how well they do on that score? not acurately. they sorted out the bits that really bugged me like a native XMLHttpRequest, XPath + XSLT support. i've not played much than ensure all of our client side apps still work correctly without the IE 6 hacks put in palace which they seem to fine (so no more hacks for IE, even on advanced client side JS sites, weee). > As far as I could figure out from the documentation they were filling in > a few gaps on the CSS level 2 support, but it didn't look like the major > standards were being advanced much at all (SVG, Xforms etc). Of course > some, or all of these maybe done with plug-ins, but that isn't ideal. On this note, see: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83948 please vote for it if you feel strongly enough to care, too ;) aaaanyway, IMO Gecko is currently the most advanced mainstream HTML rendering engine around, and i've never said otherwise :-) ~ Theo -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html