[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] OT: CMS
On 15 Feb 2005, at 20:54, Neil Williams wrote:
I disagree with you, but I do not have the time to counter each of your
arguments.
For what it's worth, Plone is a very capable and standards supporting
CMS. It may not be to everyone's tastes, but then neither are Mambo or
any of the other CMS products out there.
For my particular choice, Plone wins because:-
* It support web standards properly. That is, it produces valid markup
and is accessible.
* It is easy to use - a non techie can pick it up in 10 mins.
* It is easy to add new features - Collective on sf.net - loads of new
stuff.
All the other CMS products I tried, were tricky to use, complicated or
didn't support standards, simply.
matt
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
