[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Sadie Brinham wrote:
http://reuters.com/audi/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=KPBNIU4SC4Z4SCRBAEKSFFA?type=technologyNews&storyID=6852759
Quoting the article:
Ballmer said the security fears some governments had about using Microsoft software were overblown.
"We think our software is far more secure than open-source software. It
is more secure because we stand behind it, we fixed it, because we built
it. Nobody ever knows who built open-source software," he said.
Let's examine these statements:
"We think"... presumably "we" also think the world is flat, which is equally fanciful :) Saying Windows is more secure than Open Source software is, in my opinion, akin to saying a chihuahua is a better guard dog than a Doberman. The former may have a chance of tripping up a thief, but that's about all the hope it's got.
As for "we built it so we can fix it", that's only because they know where they put the bugs in the first place!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature