D&C Lug - Home Page
Devon & Cornwall Linux Users' Group

[ Date Index ][ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] GLUG - free and non-free



On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:57:04 +0100
Alex Charrett <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 20:39, Neil Williams wrote:

The distinction here is that your logic assumes that only one task can be done 
at a time. I don't have an off-switch for all this code - it just keeps on 
popping up. If I was in the bath or at work - anywhere at all - I get ideas 
and I formulate the code. It doesn't stop just because I'm doing something 
else. 

Not necessarily, but in this case your opportunity cost of sitting in
the bath thinking about coding is not sitting in the park thinking about
ducks (Where sitting in the park thinking about ducks represents all
your possible alternatives). You can increase this example to any number
of tasks at once.


Correct me if I'm wrong in this, Neil.  The way I see the situation is that 
regardless of whether Neil is sitting in the bath or sitting in the park thinking 
about ducks, he will still be thinking about code.  With this in mind, the 
opportunity cost of coding to Neil is zero in both cases.  True, sitting in the bath 
does preclude Neil from sitting in the park at the same time (or at least I hope it 
does :D), but neither activity would have a bearing on the opportunity cost of 
coding, which is nil.

Another way to think of it, if you like, would be to regard coding as an involuntary 
action performed by lower function of the brain - like breathing.  With practice you 
can indeed consciously prevent yourself from breathing for prolonged periods of 
time, but eventually something else takes control - be it a loss of consciousness or 
whatever - and then BAM! you're (hopefully) breathing again.

Now, if we apply this concept of how the act of coding works, then coding itself 
bears no cost (opportunity or otherwise) as it is _always_ a concurrent activity.  
The actual fruits of this coding, however, may involve an opportunity cost as the 
physical action of typing in code and testing it may preclude Neil from having a 
bath or sitting in the park (let's not talk about Laptops yet, _please_!).  Sitting 
in the bath, however, does not prevent Neil from breathing or coding.

Grant.

-- 
Artificial intelligence is no match for nuratal stidutipy.

--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.


Lynx friendly