[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
On Monday 11 October 2004 4:32 pm, Bailey Mark wrote:
IPR is FUD. It never existed, it never will. It's a construct of otherlegal structures, not an entity in itself. Perhaps you can explain how you're legally qualified to make these statements, not just about the UK, but globally?
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#IntellectualProperty It's a fad, it has no legal basis but is a construct of other legal entities which have little in common.
You only confuse the issues when you use such invalid terminology.Rofl...I'm sorry. I asked you to clarify what you meant when you said that "nobody owns software".
Grant made such a good job that I thought it would be superfluous and concentrated on dealing with the more blatant issue of confusing terminology that all GNU/Linux users should be avoiding. Please read the other messages that followed up your enquiry, everything is explained there. I don't like to repeat myself, it gets in the way of the code. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.codehelp.co.uk/ http://www.dclug.org.uk/ http://www.isbn.org.uk/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/isbnsearch/ http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x8801094A28BCB3E3
Attachment:
pgp00034.pgp
Description: PGP signature