[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 17:35:12 +0000, Simon Waters <Simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >John Horne wrote: >> >> There are specific reasons why passive ftp has been disabled. It will >> not be enabled. > >I have to ask - what reasons if it isn't too intrusive... > >This has to be the first firewall config to break passive ftp, but not >active, if I've understood the issue correctly. > >Does anyone know off hand if IPCOP (or other dedicated firewall does ftp > with a sensible proxy?)? One site just jumped from roll your own >ipchains to roll your own ipchains emulation under 2.4,and I really want >something a bit more user friendly and easier to audit. > >I have a recent IPCOP CD, I just don't have any PC's to hand on which I >feel happy to answer "yes" to the "this will destroy all exising >partitions, ok" question. (Actually lots of old PC's to hand just a >shortage of CDROM drives). Simon, I have spare CDROM drive here if you need it Dave -- FROM: address killfiled. Use REPLY-TO: address for replies ! http://www.eclipse.co.uk/morgad/index.html gpg:0x64B5E037 Distributed Proofreaders : http://www.pgdp.net UKRA#1243 (Level 1) Independant Flyer -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe.