Re: [LUG] Databases

[Bill Wilson <bill@xxxxxxxx>]

Bill@xxxx

We chose postgresql as our experience showed that it was robust. If money
was no object I would choos Unify & Accell as a complete development
environment. We have used it for 16 years and it is rock solid but expensive.
Also delivers a web enabled application.


martin.gautier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Alternatively, is the need for a development or design environment that 
> > >       
> >       
> doesn't do the work, but does autmatically assemble certain components of 
> the 
> eventual product.
>
> In my (limited Linux but vg windows) experience, that would be 
> Kylix/Delphi with practically any other (supported) database backend.
>
> I think what Adrian is describing is a RAD tool. So the question is - Is 
> there a Linux based RAD database with Paradox/Access Admin and Client GUI.
>
> Isn't there something like that in Open Office? (I don't know, I don't use 
> it, and haven't got around to installing it yet).
>
> For a semi-rugged, low-user, performance semi-critical, rapidly developed 
> database I've agree that the Access/VB is a pretty good choice of 
> development model. On a Linux set-up, I'd go for Kylix as the dev tool - 
> any recommendations for the backend database?
>
> Mart
>
>
> --
> The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
> Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
> message body to unsubscribe.
>
> intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)
>
>
>
>       
      
      
      


***** YLEM DISCLAIMER  *****

To obtain a copy of Ylem's email disclaimer ring 01398 323146

intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)