[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Alex Charrett wrote: | Quoting Pete Hatton <pete@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: | | |>>A friend of mine had recently subscribed to the cable |>>internet service from blueyonder, after recieving many many |>>attepmted connction to his bootp port on his win98 box he |>>called them up and asked what was going on (he uses blackice) |>>It would appear as though they require to be able to access |>>particuar ports on his box.. |>> |>>Can anyone see a reason behind this ? I sure can't, i fan ISP |>>of mine did that i would be MOST disgruntled and do lots of |>>question asking till i got to the bottom of this. |>> |>>If there is a good reason for this behavour, then i'll let |>>him know, if not i'll send him back to their tech ppl. |> |>The IP address for the cable connection is assign using DHCP which IIRC |>need ports 68 and 69 to be open (The network experts will correct me) |> |>My connection here is assigned by DHCP, and once it has the IP, the |>Iptables firewall kicks in. | | | 68 is bootp and 69 is tftp. Handy if you're setting up a server for a remote | diskless workstation to hang off but shouldn't be necessary for this | application. | | Alex. |
Thats what i figured.... it is the bootp port that gets a hammering... i suppose i could advise him to leave this one port open ? or is that not sucha smart move. Any ISP i have used never probed my ports ever, but if thats what they need...
Neil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE92z5oETbMU8Wu6mERAmh6AKCDXWx+p7CFCHR6X1lEQyomHoM3EACdHaTo EkP3DW9fJg54fVO7RbpI5HA= =rrXL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe.