[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] sending e-mail in plain text
- To: "list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [LUG] sending e-mail in plain text
- From: mr meowski <mr.meowski@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 14:29:23 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=mr.meowski@xxxxxxxx;
- Content-id: <71E272DAA1F1EA45A5D5109B99D3E0EB@eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
- Content-language: en-US
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dclug.org.uk; s=1523264761; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type :Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject :MIME-Version:Content-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Date:To:From:Cc: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PUlEYv9/xD25j1CxTGX+zWC/qET96tkdnlRbLdANqOs=; b=VoBDP/6P8bnpaRB7uAclH3lF91 Sxrxqaop8Kqq+/gahS7VHTV0v6g4R3BIJhbX69xVeT4UDGHcemZsCq+C8oLvhWtYNEh7tRHUW16Zt UQMpVq7+veSXqcJRppU8zJeCC3iNtv6kho7VUL6c+7wjzW+TkY6h/ahPXFmDnF9e/nj0=;
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=live.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KZ9xxV4CIc53kbpr++tLWsfiPJ+y/X+6D3FJtwRyEjQ=; b=BqhLHtLuzYwFCFBaqiuxUyPBv8reYZSwIXRF4ZiKrzRI5U0RyuV9LIp1Zrxa+UMmvpjjCZGjPEJJeSsd6CBKzlVQ9IZo1AJI5HrsZ+Am/L/9+xx9KYkA87XgInw/bhbHsajOohyPJYav9BiBkk5pdcBd2AZhNyPn8ZKYKBQ0evGnl7AFLz5mX2RRBdz3+2wer1C7XBodAFhJqVt73Pr2txAK8zbO0awh4UD6Nc4/1UHQwWE/5FeDl6uRHOo/ekK2RTxVvYysAYCt7EyHXwTQDkKstXg95p6I17RNn1Dxrtz7Tu69M2zW2YpjJDyVZnP6KsMnBN7ginLu5FUxEzRBFQ==
- Thread-index: AQHT/w+6awXYA2Mrq0m11zH1V+UwUKRWZRMAgAABgACAAAHGgIAAA7WA
- Thread-topic: [LUG] sending e-mail in plain text
On 08/06/18 15:16, Martijn Grooten wrote:
>
> Sure, but what I'm not sure about if there aren't scenarios in which the
> HTML is still rendered. For example when there is no plain text MIME
> part.
>
> Martijn
>
Well when you've finished reading all the RFCs and the Thunderbird
source code please get back and let us know!
I should maybe have been more precise - in my experience as an end user
it's always been fine. I'm not a security researcher so I haven't
exactly done a massive in-depth technical analysis of potential flaws in
Thunderbird MIME handling believe it or not.
In fact, I'm pretty sure that's your job... :]
Cheers
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
https://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
