[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] NFS or Samba
- To: "list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [LUG] NFS or Samba
- From: mr meowski <mr.meowski@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 18:46:12 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
- Authentication-results: dcglug.org.uk; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dcglug.org.uk; dmarc=none action=none header.from=live.com;
- Content-id: <47897E055382E14CA4A403867E988D4C@eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
- Content-language: en-US
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dclug.org.uk; s=1491642364; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Date:To:From; bh=YldjaCOobbKUGIvlauGZuG+9uOQ9r6H+0AcdCp4XF9Y=; b=Cl40JznfCE1PWc3B/9DmLsAVuF7F+sLEIOWeoQtsl/CawFsGQZ8yF3pCo0Yenjzko5hqHu59N0/g11XRYycLGtC1VcyFiwfk+F3mMvGtow1c3ootByKHgjPziycLLxhj3h+sPmfJZ5KCxhMr2c313DcyyqJMy4K79WDvBZMzU+g=;
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=live.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=pImnEh7JX43OSItiUdYcDXfdUWe3DJsNy8W8/mjOx4E=; b=Ib18Y4+8M4URPbQMCwpkjceE++5HiJV5QTG+gHKqZOCTT1ZD6wclLyCDeY5z/jqQOisq9j4EQDRCgIMAiA7WYm3clWsQW4JV1HTU3+zk4zHoBy8DtCox5kmF9IC0OHkGzSkrMumJQEHNZ+lGj6SfpLUKGYUsZF8gz9g0g6Kv5gSUdXwlhSUyriRr/EHFi9+mAkupL4E4+msRggtTJx5BKaJlcJXm3qleRjMBOkUzMp1pDHRrFKZ0yjxzWnVMNJKdRYMqU3nX5tvThXTcAJmSQuxQMtmEu7nA+ruT81Se2FqgWeZiijld7RPSIrPMhM/ZJPT9NMYhVje8LD3aJrEuVA==
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
- Thread-index: AQHTJ/OjY6W4fFYnzUC4rA5dqWSDOKKpwzKA
- Thread-topic: [LUG] NFS or Samba
On 07/09/17 17:08, Adrian Midgley wrote:
> Main data store and a few services on an always-on microserver.
>
> Processing on the big machine with the Ryzen CPU etc, but this switched
> off to conserve power in between.
>
> NFS seems flaky.
> Samba seems quick and reliable.
>
> is NFS an abandoned antique, or should it work quickly and cleanly?
No reason you can't have both surely? I export my generally available
networked $STUFF internally over http, ftp, CIFS, NFS and SSH so pretty
much anything can get at it one way or the other.
NFS - particularly v4 - should be rock solid in practice. What transport
are you using? If it's wifi, the problem is probably there rather than
in the protocol. NFS and SMB/CIFS can both typically stand a lot of
tuning if you like that sort of thing: neither are necessarily firing on
all cylinders straight out of the box.
Cheers
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
https://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
