[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] bash vulnerability

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] bash vulnerability
From: Tom <madtom1999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:49:08 +0100
Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcglug.org.uk; s=1396810045; h=Sender:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From; bh=E8YNVdDSIWmioC7CgmfGh+gLc0Sr3S/2sVCcZA1MG8w=; b=T/0HQMITmKpxrV58RbWzBO+nUF/Cbpb8iYLv/U8SDQONxKg76xcC5XTqP18Hw+Q40ZurCCn4pRHKErVAoGJHQxm6KT5oU0QrueOwVDNFxSuyDNPdc5ZRdgisnuRG/UssVihhb96wC/ZqFfppUhFR4GxHVA47z25MJY9vd797W+E=;
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dvjhgc6cesTH97uYsy6UzMeKDj8QEKCFcvVBTsY+vvU=; b=WwQSidyrRqtIxjZZuKUJwtnrxYV4YvBi9g6LWRiFlqRzmEsicJ3M0E8R1cNvV71AX7 pxazGpw/H8+HU1adLu2LkX8yhgb6GTa2E+GyVYRZdsG5IBmUYpMgivO8IGR4appHfYad autNoIdCkF6c9d+alkgf+nyj/EVLlgYinTNPrP07/Fc4aAWa6eUsbRol5AMYjjzKaQE+ TAzIjkV/DxwpBFCeRBzxrzAeT7XvGYCApYN1+DNtDb8BHtZulTV4l3K3qCfkZNEu5Wjn cuthIT5T9ugf2i1N/0bTD0CuHskDf0D7Xx2mYX4C+CfFMwjbmmFZkp1K7qy2c1PIhPvm PIEQ==

On 25/09/14 09:31, lug@xxxxxx wrote:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:03:15 +0100, Tom <madtom1999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Stories going around about a bash vulnerability:
test with
$env x='() { :;}; echo vulnerable' bash -c 'echo hello'
and update!
Tom te tom te tom


Gotta love a 22 year old bug.

Kevin

Its in Mac as well but apparently its a LINUX (DID YOU HEAR ME LINUX)bug and not really Macy at all even though they havent fixed it yet!

Tom te tom te tom

--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq

References:
- [LUG] bash vulnerability
  - From: Tom
- Re: [LUG] bash vulnerability
  - From: lug