D&C GLug - Home Page

[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Debian (Stable vs Unstable)

 

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Benjamin M. A'Lee
<bma+lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'd suggest that the best thing to do for a server is to use Stable,
> then add backports for the packages you want newer versions of.
>

Actually right at this moment, stable may not be the best choice.
Stable is currently still etch and thats getting quite old. Lenny is
however frozen and pretty upto date and is in the process of becoming
the next stable. So it might be an idea to go lenny (testing) now and
ride this through to lenny becoming "stable".

But don't add lenny or sid packages to an etch system unless you know
what you are doing (eg backporting your self). Expect breakage if you
do and if you point your source.lst at testing or unstable you will
actually just end up upgrading your system to that version anyway.

Robin

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html