[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 02:38:55PM +0100, Ross Bearman wrote: > I'm not sure what you're getting at? Google didn't modify the GPL, > they release Chrome under the GPL and had a EULA that you had to agree > to when installing; they're completely separate licenses. And adding extra restrictions on top of the GPL is explicitly disallowed by the section I quoted. Either you dual-licence it (GPL or EULA, and all of one applies OR all of the other applies) or it's invalid. -- Benjamin M. A'Lee || mail: bma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx web: http://subvert.org.uk/~bma/ || gpg: 0xBB6D2FA0 -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html