[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
RE: [LUG] BIND and non 255.255.255.0 netmasks.
> It claims the technique it suggests is an IETF draft
> ietf-cidr-classless-inaddr-01
What version of the book do you have? In this one (v3) I cannot see any
mention of that document. However it does refer to RFC 2317, which I would
have thought is a similar thing.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2317.txt
> If you can avoid delegating the DNS management below the class C level
> life is a lot simpler <hint hint>. I mean scalability in delegation is
> one thing, but 250 hosts or less - just make it static and manage it
> centrally. Some problems are best solved nontechnically.
I am somewhat confused by these documents atm, possibly because my
understanding of subnet masks is not what it should be.
Everything I am reading seems to be assuming that I want to delegate out
bits of a network. But I don't really want to do that. Unless it's the
only way to achive what I'm trying to do.
--
**********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended
only for the individuals named above. If you are not the
intended recipient, you should be aware that any
dissemination, distribution, forwarding or other duplication
of this communication is strictly prohibited. The views
expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual author
and not necessarily those of
Securicor Information Systems Limited.
Prior to taking any action based upon this e-mail message
you should seek appropriate confirmation of its authenticity.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify the sender by using the e-mail reply facility.
**********************************************************************
--
lug-list - The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo at lists.termisoc.org with "unsubscribe lug-list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.
