[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Reinstalling.
Too much oddness.
Fully backed up, and a data drive physically separate from the system drive, which should make life easier.
On 03/01/16 12:57, Martijn Grooten wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 09:18:30AM +0000, Adrian Midgley wrote:
>> Found my hosts file no longer has lots of 127.0.0.n entries for advertisers.
>
> I wouldn't know what happened in this particular case, but it has
> happened to me quite a few times that a config file in /etc was reverted
> to the default version or a previous version, because of another
> program that used its own config file and used that to overwrite the
> actual config file.
>
> It's annoying, but I would assume that rather than malice.
>
> Martijn.
Yet another reason to use etckeeper to version /etc automatically unless
you're using a snapshotting filesystem or something similar.
/etc/hosts is provided by the debian-installer netcfg package and as
such *shouldn't* be touched by post-install packages so it's unlikely
you missed one of the messages that go like this:
==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version.
 ÂWhat would you like to do about it ? Your options are:
  Y or I : install the package maintainer's version
  N or O : keep your currently-installed version
   D  Â: show the differences between the versions
   Z  Â: start a shell to examine the situation
ÂThe default action is to keep your current version.
So you can grep for it but I doubt there will be an /etc/hosts.dpkg-old
as it won't be apt that's clobbered it.
Version or snapshot any mountpoint you care about I guess is the moral
of the story. At least it was only hosts eh, and not sshd_config...
Cheers
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq