[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Truecrypt

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] Truecrypt
From: Gordon Henderson <gordon+lug@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 17:59:55 +0100 (BST)
Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Distribution: world
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcglug.org.uk; s=1396810045; h=Sender:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Reply-To:Subject:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date; bh=dk2qKXdELilnjpVwO8FB036eFg9muz7TBJzRC+B5SM8=; b=SCTRPA6jxpUDpe4WGGNIiKVk7QTn8P3MqDyLxzO1ewOZJfYm+9ZR0ts+uRhATo+i97CWrwIiZCSH1oic2k16LnmTjqmaCXyoXajDuCOk8Fdlhn9izzIXXTTxKQ0cDTPlt6832OHQ6Wz8GQ0p/+J79oLZxT2+XVjwqV/+UXKxHuE=;

On Thu, 29 May 2014, Neil Winchurst wrote:

I have used Truecrypt in the past but it appears the something has gone
wrong with the program and it is no longer considered 'safe'.

I just used it to have a folder to keep some private documents. Now it
is no longer any use, could I ask people what they use/recommend
instead?


What's wrong with the version you currently have?

Just because the current source/binaries appear somewhat suspiciousdoesn't mean (for now) that the older version you have isn't good.


Or have I missed something?

Gordon

--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq

Follow-up: Re: [LUG] Truecrypt
- From: Neil Winchurst

References:
- [LUG] Truecrypt
  - From: Neil Winchurst

Prev by Date: [LUG] Truecrypt
Next by Date: [LUG] Cross-Platform Truecrypt Replacement?
Previous by thread: [LUG] Truecrypt
Next by thread: Re: [LUG] Truecrypt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread