[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] EU ruling on Google
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] EU ruling on Google
- From: Martijn Grooten <martijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:54:52 +0000
- Content-disposition: inline
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcglug.org.uk; s=1396810045; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:To:From:Date; bh=4FlB0SoXdDySu79MGq6n2E1qn2/KiLIBaSHUwhB8igM=; b=Mg3N5SKQKozTeSC5OL3ryuRCbasYrqxpLJgGxvrafZSkJxs1t5/LE6Ut2Qg4shYL942ISgpRkjWDNj0HwBZRsc5Z0duSkYmDuoUt07/x8wIzLt1XqpNYmgKu5um/dezP54QnBGnreHw2W6gJoFgUKJYelBLo1k07Xs39HFpmiLY=;
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lapsedordinary.net; s=mail; t=1400151292; bh=+u1NRKki/uDXPup+AMPyUVNy7j+FqXwTlL36DtMe4Ss=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=FohjupmesgdxSoXKafIsm4thiMBzAvEHeAC4lpOEPTR30IG25Pjj+RIUcAYMmboDY qGys3LK2vEmYBoPQhS7IIYrIQ50PtOAItZZrAzKX56IVaEwBTEXq8NM6alV0Dn/i3+ po/354R1V/z3W+ZvJhtOvaN03K9Um0XRIWpDg6xc=
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:28:06AM +0100, Philip Hudson wrote:
> No; in relative terms, they did no work at all to create their search
> engine. [etc.]
I agree with some of the things you say here. But that's a moral
argument, not one that is, or should be, valid court.
Just like to a court the argument that the argument that whatever Google
is being asked to do will be too expensive and will ruin their business
model shouldn't play a big role.
(I think we've concluded we agree on this.)
Martijn.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
