[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Red Hat EL considered harmful

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] Red Hat EL considered harmful
From: Simon Avery <digdilem@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:58:24 +0000
Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/Ac4zgeSVF1Irzf/dzALLEDTMpISgNrBY1HgNB7ACfI=; b=OxLrTq48bK3/FF90iayOEvzRaYPiUeuN32T3g5wrbqnjsejYmsGUe1mCX8g+XRbWAl f0zeHjzG54OCnInmJ1M1ZfSBwxmmmqux6yd6fedmtBvVCIbnamjprEjYVbVuvoje1lIm /f7QXMwRzQLBWYi6r6uYvcwbXbA8VrVaS1Jh44STo/Vq1VLuPAmWkfwtzUPhVYdYFxLK Z/IfU0z69zdl5QFBx4o8+I25fCELonhRS+HbpmMQzdvw80AvLGO/U5DRGzEOPH/qjgya dZxbZLUSwoZ9gXO/dqCZYzO30rWrikZsMDMSwsQs3LXFOEsBgU1Tdw0wCVytt6ZPJQNY Jytw==

On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Philip Hudson wrote:

http://techrights.org/2014/01/17/rhel-security/#comment-148626

Wish I knew what you were on about. This is just a goofy subject (with a reference to a 1968 article by Dijkstra which is going to be lost of 95% of the people here) and a link to a comment in the middle of an article that really doesn't make any sense at all.

Glad it's not just me!

Looking around at some of the other stories, that entire site is more than a little biased. Foaming tin-hat bonkers, really. Is anything from there to be trusted?

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq

References:
- [LUG] Red Hat EL considered harmful
  - From: Philip Hudson
- Re: [LUG] Red Hat EL considered harmful
  - From: Gordon Henderson

Prev by Date: Re: [LUG] Red Hat EL considered harmful
Next by Date: Re: [LUG] Red Hat EL considered harmful
Previous by thread: Re: [LUG] Red Hat EL considered harmful
Next by thread: Re: [LUG] Red Hat EL considered harmful
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread