D&C GLug - Home Page

[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Single-board computers and software freedom

 

On 24/05/13 22:32, Grant Phillips-Sewell wrote:
On 24 May 2013 16:25, Matt Lee <mattl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Right, I'm talking about a chip that you cannot flash. Whatever is on
that chip, it doesn't matter -- the chip? That's hardware.

Yep, the chip would be hardware. My point, though, was that it *seems* that
RMS/FSF are quite OK with chips having code on them that ordinarily
wouldn't be modifiable... but the moment the code becomes something that
has to be loaded onto said chip (ie "uploadable firmware"), then it becomes
a problem.

Let's take, for example, WiFi cards. If the card has a chip on it that has
code "burned" into it allowing only the most restrictive WiFi channels and
signal strengths to be used, so it can work universally without breaking
any country's laws, but the card does NOT need this code to be loaded onto
it - it comes with the code already there - then this is OK. Apparently it
is "hardware". The moment a WiFi card needs the code to be "uploaded" to it
then it is no longer classed as pure hardware and so if said code is not
Free Software, it is a baaad thing.

How that distinction make sense in anyone's mind is completely beyond me.

(Incidentally, I'm not arguing that non-Free firmware is allowable, I'm
arguing that - to my mind - they're operating with double standards.)

Grant.



Your failure to understand is incredible.

Regards
-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq