[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] Microsoft restricted boot
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] Microsoft restricted boot
- From: Martijn Grooten <sweetwatergeek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:43:09 +0100
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=bGszhD1CP5Q+zeFWEk2z7H4RGylmxlIFYYa0w1RY97g=; b=xoNuKQhMeKEYffuCNDDjYO5N7divuM8ag3VwMm2wk5UMZcscB3zmnY9uMl1g1oTEl8 RBrFHBmc/8r4h0IJ8W1MCc6xDtMvbQ3d+4OqkUGAFse34zNhV3XySAm0qOtWKBhd1FyW ztDDzLoxj4AI+6DbepCh5+GWsyAapnv4PrQ58=
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Gibbs wrote:
> I doubt it will quite turn out like being suggested by some people
> (especially after all the stick Microsoft gets from the EU).
+1
Can't imagine they'll even try this. (And the idea of Secure Boot
actually sounds like a good one.)
Martijn.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
