[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] iptables and hackers
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] iptables and hackers
- From: Dan Dart <dandart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:56:56 +0100
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=lvEcBr2qKY6K6ZF01WhnzjDaY887F9G91QRmlsLBcPc=; b=HYgXP+8IU7J8YZunimiazZxbkRJTBcjxKFmnZFBfPwxuYq1WT7SAmT1em+OBed4bJ2 9Y8Gf4yk4ATGSuS8ugNDOdtZXlIV4gRAEIUMeVbyYS4kjkeOFQglZD/ej5L3wHBTxeTN F1kTek4nP4EOZf4n5i2dAHs9Ep0aXeiavi658=
Fail2ban by default works on SSHD and does a good job at it.
Maybe there's a script/IDS0 somewhere that says... Too many 404/500s
for dodgy URLs? Block!"
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
