[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Wave, Ubu 9.10 and APT-Cacher-NG

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] Wave, Ubu 9.10 and APT-Cacher-NG
From: dandart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:34:13 +0000

Apt-cacher-ng?
How does it compare to Apt-move?
Sounds like the same idea, or is it something different?

Cheers

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html

Follow-up: Re: [LUG] Wave, Ubu 9.10 and APT-Cacher-NG
- From: tom

References:
- Re: [LUG] Wave, Ubu 9.10 and APT-Cacher-NG
  - From: John Williams

Prev by Date: Re: [LUG] Wave, Ubu 9.10 and APT-Cacher-NG
Next by Date: Re: [LUG] OT- Cheap Laptop + ARM netbooks
Previous by thread: Re: [LUG] Wave, Ubu 9.10 and APT-Cacher-NG
Next by thread: Re: [LUG] Wave, Ubu 9.10 and APT-Cacher-NG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread