[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rob Beard wrote: > On 13/03/2009 09:21, Paul Sutton wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Rob Beard wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Looks like OLPC are asking for the impossible (or highly unlikely), they >>> want Microsoft to port Windows 7 to ARM! >>> >>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/402/1051402/olpc-urges-microsoft-windows-arm >>> >>> I can't help but thinking that if they didn't dump Linux for Windows >>> then it wouldn't really be much of an issue. I bet the nearest they'll >>> get is Microsoft offering them Windows Mobile. >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> >>> >> The argument for windows is the huge catalogue of applications that are >> available for it, (granted there are lots for Linux), but its key apps >> people seem to want, e.g office, so to port Windows 7 to arm people >> will then expect office ported and that will push up the cost, >> >> > Yes the problem is, all these apps are specifically compiled for x86 > (and in some cases AMD64 or Itanium), it didn't work out last time > Microsoft did it with NT (porting to MIPS, PPC) and I am under the > impression that these machines are pretty low speed compared to a normal > desktop PC so I'd say even trying to emulate an x86 (like what Apple do > with PPC code on x86) would probably be too slow to bve usable. That's > before factoring in the fact that Windows is a whole pile of bloatware. >> before long OLPC will end up as one laptop per class, due to the huge >> cost of windows and related software licensing, not to mention anti >> virus etc. >> >> Why not stick to Linux it works. >> > Yep, at least going down the Linux route they would have had less of a > job building a custom distro (or even taking maybe something like > Debian) and putting it on an ARM based machine. > > Rob > > Perhaps they will now rethink their policy having been seduced by the glossy ness of Microsoft marketing, it's no aparent, that MS software can't hack it, or they need more features and they can't. OSS - you have source code, you can compile it for what ever you want Perhaps we can formulate a response to this, that simply highlights the advantage of OSS over propriatory software. you have the source. Paul - -- Paul Sutton www.zleap.net Support Open and ISO standard file formats ISO 26300 odf http://www.odfalliance.org Next Linux User Group meet : April 4th : 3pm, Shoreline Cafe Paignton -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm6RTgACgkQaggq1k2FJq1WSACeJWVrczLX+bzU7Tl9E+ejVlDJ mt8An2KoGxxT/nFKHP1qMnSI7dL+XpjQ =yJpr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html