[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Ross Bearman wrote: > I always found, and this might just me, but code explanations written > as closely to pseudo code make a lot more sense. Definitely not just > psuedo code, but I tend to try and be simplistic and black and white > in most of my comments. When I'm reading other people code, I find it > jarring when somebody who is clearly a good coder, but not so much a > good writer, trying to explain a complex procedure using > conversational language. When trying to explain a binary process, it's > much simpler to explain it in simple terms as the computer sees it, > rather than trying to bend the English language to your will. > > Regards, Ross Bearman > I've tended to find that trying to teach a complex process is easiest done (and best understood) by explaining it this way too. Grant. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html