[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Grant Sewell wrote: > Compatibility? With who? With yourselves in 15 years time? Not too > sure about how Microsoft feel about that. Integration into what? > Supportability... personally I wouldn't want to have to support a system > that so clearly has a UseBy date on it that's only a few years away. > Affordability? They will have to retrain their staff in MSOffice 2007 > And no doubt 2008, 2009, ad nauseum. Also MS products have a nasty habit of not being backwardly compatible, so if you save a file in, for example Word 2007 format, the chances of it reading in 2003 are not especially high. Hell when I was doing support we had all kinds of fun with people using Outlook and Outlook Express with disappearing attachments because they weren't compatible with each other. IMHO the compatibility argument is a non-starter because as soon as one organisation upstream 'upgrades' their software even staying within MS, everyone downstream has to follow suit or start receiving files they can't open. Better to change now to an Open standard that at least can be upgraded in the future either free or at minimum cost. Kind regards, Julian -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html