[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Arch Linux

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] Arch Linux
From: "Ben Goodger" <goodgerster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:31:18 +0100

On 6/19/07, Alex Charrett <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Ben Goodger wrote:

> Hello
>
> Any Arch Linux people here? I'm giving it a test out and can't get
> xchat-gnome to run... :(
>
>

I've been running Arch for about 6 months now, I'm very impressed with it.

Any errors to share with us?

I'm now back in Debian (arch remains) and I'll be posting a review of Arch soonish. The basic feel is that APT/Aptitude/the-apt-repositories could learn from pacman, but Arch is inferior in most other respects.

--
Ben Goodger

"Exams have concluded. Please trudge immediately to A2."

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html

Follow-up: Re: [LUG] Arch Linux
- From: Simon Williams

References:
- [LUG] Arch Linux
  - From: Ben Goodger
- Re: [LUG] Arch Linux
  - From: Alex Charrett

Prev by Date: Re: [LUG] OT Printing Costs
Next by Date: Re: [LUG] Xubuntu is genuine windows
Previous by thread: Re: [LUG] Arch Linux
Next by thread: Re: [LUG] Arch Linux
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread