[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
> -----Original Message----- > From: list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of stinga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: 10 November 2006 14:38 > To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [LUG] kernels and modules (again) > > > On 10/11/06 14:03:25, David Johnson wrote: > > On Friday 10 November 2006 13:34, stinga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > OK... > > > More research shoes, that the kernel has too match exactly, how > > > exactly? > > > > Exactly. You need the specific kernel the module was > designed to work > > with - > > not just similar, exactly the same. > > In all the pages I have googled for you are the first to > actaully give > what the error really is. > > > > > > How can I find out what the module actually needs? > > > > Ask the vendor. > > ROTFL!!! > Here is their answer to that question... > Unfortunately ,as far as compiling config options are > concerned, we are > not > able to help you and you should refer to your distribution support or > documentation. > > OK, well that explains the problem, I now need to find away > out of this > problem... > > > > > > > The kernel name matches, I.E. the output from uname -a, since when > > it > > > didn't I was getting another error. > > > > Is the module supposed to work with a distro kernel? For example, if > > the > > module is written to work with a Fedora-modified 2.6.9 kernel, you > > need that > > exact kernel - a vanilla 2.6.9 from kernel.org may be the same > > version, but > > it's not the same kernel. > > > > > I suppose it goes back to my, what exactly does that error mean? > > > > You're trying to use the module with a kernel other than the one it > > was > > written for. > > > > What distribution is the module designed to work with? I'd be very > > surprised > > if it wasn't available for download somewhere. > > Red Hat EL 4 update 2 (kernel 2.6.9-22) & update 3 (kernel 2.6.9-34) > SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9.0 (kernel 2.6.5-7.257) If my idea doesnt work use Centos kernel (free el RH) or the src rpm of RH el are available. > > Can I take a an FC? and compile a EL4 kernel and expect it to > run? or > am I asking from problems? > > Otherwise I am going to have to go to a previous version of > the module > and use SUSE Pro 9.2, even that has issues. > > FAiling that, I will have to go back to a redhat kernel > version 2.2 era > and just use that. > > Thanks for the info, at least I know what the issue is now. > > > -- > 'ooroo > > stinga...(:)-) > --------------------------------------------------- > Email: stinga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx o > You need only two tools. o ///// > A hammer and duct tape. If it /@ `\ /) ~ > doesn't move and it should, > (O) X< ~ Fish!! > use the hammer. If it moves and `\___/' \) ~ > shouldn't, use the tape. \\\ > --------------------------------------------------- > > -- > The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG > http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list > FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html > > > Click > https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/wQw0zmjPoHdJTZGyOCrrhg== I1vDNSOVMo7irTZDxJyq7oqg3MqMtD!k8yKk!ESj7pmfH8wYjXloOaA== to report this email as spam to Sanctuary Housing's managed spam filter,BlackSpider. (Do NOT click on 'remove me' or other links from spam as that usually just confirms your email to the spammers and can lead to malicious websites) -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html