[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
> >> A cool 4G of swap at 0.1ms access time! > > A ramdisk is faster > > But given that linux caches memory, isn't it better simply to leave any > extra ram available for linux to manage than to assign it as a swap, > which after all, is for when the memory cannot manage? You obviously didn't follow the link (or didn't understand it). It's a hardware ramdisk which plugs into the mobo. you could install windows on it if you wanted. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html