[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 10:20:57AM +0300, Kai Hendry wrote:
I think DCLUG works nicely with mutt thanks to the Reply-to: header.
Whoa. I take this back. Just learnt about the potential evils of Reply-to munging: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6693&group_id=1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature