[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Open source code is not a threat - even if it is Microsoft code. This is a brilliant example of what is so bad with software patents - open code tends to better code because the developers cannot hide behind NDA's, DCMA, EULA's or patents. Developers are human and the path of least
Also they can't nick other people's software and claim it as their own. Windows source code being made available could open up Microsoft to claims of copyright infringement.
resistence is always the one to follow when a deadline is looming. If you don't NEED to write secure code, the chances are that you won't take the time to avoid possible exploits or even remove ones that are already known to you. Easier and quicker to hope that no-one else spots what you've already seen.
Similarly if the code is unlikely to be seen no need to check who's code it actually is.
Source code is NOT a trade secret and it should not be patented!
Having something as a trade secret dosn't help much if that secret ever gets out. Patents, if applied correctly, are mutually exclusive with trade secrets. Since the application should contain all relevent details.
Source code is a form of speech, it is created free and is created to be shared.
(n.b. this is not anti-Microsoft for the sake of it - I believe it illustrates a classic problem for those who would try to shackle the freedom of any computer code, including SCO.)
Their idea appears to be some kind of elaborate method to subvert the normal operation of copyright law.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature