Re: [LUG] CSS reference extended, as requested

[Jonathan Melhuish <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 25 June 2003 16:14, Adrian Midgley wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 June 2003 12:06, you wrote:
> > Okay, so it's "forbidden" to use tables for page layout, but
> > what *real* reasons are there for doing everything in CSS?
>
> Access for those who cannot read the page for whatever reason is
> improved if the layout is rendered in CSS rather than tables.

Can screen-readers not cope with tables?  What is it about CSS that makes it 
easier to "read"?

Sorry for my ignorance, I'm afraid I shall probably stay that way unless 
somebody gives me a compelling reason to change ;-)

Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE++dI5eTVvFHAhe5cRArKxAKCHfa89hRAbLavG5qJOng71gzJHRgCdE8Qi
WR4xmM+D/duKaJWiG0HMfss=
=qSZk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.