[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Neil Williams wrote:
Anyone have any ideas why KMail handles a GnuPG signature differently from Mutt / Evolution? Is there a 'correct' way of handling signatures?
RFC2015 was the proposed standard - it is what Mutt will be doing I think. Possible the world moved on.
It defeats the object of the signature a bit if it isn't evident that the message is signed!
Surely that is "it defeats the purpose if it isn't clear that a message was signed by an unrevoked private key". Either way I'm sure you should be checking with a key registry every time. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe.