Re: [LUG] toners

["Martin Palmer" <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Doh! Sorry I had intended for the message to be to the original recepient.
Apologies all round for not paying enough attention.

I promise to do better next time!

Cheers
Martin

----- Original Message -----
From: Alex Charrett <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] toners


>
> The spammer in question is not a member of the list and therefore will not
> have read your mail(s).  Everyone who is subscribed to the list will have
> (as they will be able to read this mail).
>
> The list is set up so that each mail send out has a reply-to address added
> to it for the address list@xxxxxxxxxxxx in order to encourage
> discussuion.
>
> IMHO, as a rule of thumb replying to spam geneally only serves to prove to
> the spammer that the address they sent to exists and in this case could
> add your address to their spam list as well as that of the lug mailing
> list.
>
> Myself and Pete now think we have that domain site-badded on both servers.
>
> Alex.
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Martin Palmer wrote:
>
> > I'd appreciate it if you'd stop spamming this list - if you think you're
> > going to get any business this way then you are seriously mistaken
>
>
> --
> The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
> Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
> message body to unsubscribe.
>

--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.