[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 11 Feb 2003 7:38 pm, David Johnson wrote: > Theo Zourzouvillys wrote: > >On Tuesday 11 February 2003 6:50 pm, David Johnson wrote: > >>56k to ISDN is certainly a worthwhile upgrade in my experience (despite > >>often costing more than ADSL). > > > >Most certianly - 56k is unbearable! 128k is just about managable. The > > worst hting is if you get broadband, then forced back to 128kbit ISDN :p > > Heh, unless you're unfortunate enough to have SurfTime and be restricted > to single channel ISDN :-( Single channel ISDN is still faster than analogue modem though? No? It's been awhile since I looked at ISDN and the BT site isn't exactly verbose. In real usage, how much faster would you rate 64k ISDN over 56k modem? (Bear in mind that my current ISP isn't amongst the slickest performers over 56k.) - -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.codehelp.co.uk http://www.dclug.org.uk http://www.wewantbroadband.co.uk/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+SW0qiAEJSii8s+MRAhgDAKCUFMLvWVQ3KU7wXXPoVtuDLTPFjACgrieK qGmo53s66G0jNi3cTo8+4YY= =StUL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe.