D&C Lug - Home Page
Devon & Cornwall Linux Users' Group

[ Date Index ][ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] Licences preventing the user from using other OSes?



On Monday 06 May 2002 07:43, you wrote:

http://prorev.com/luddites.htm
Fun.
I think he may have missed the option of _not_ upgrading. 
A licence for XP permits users to install 2k or NT4 (it is unclear to me if 
it permits people outside the NHS to install 98) 
The status of OEM licencing of software, and what constitutes original 
machines, or the items of hardware with which such OEM licences may be sold 
has not AFAIK and IANAL been resolved, but it is at least possible that this 
user could have installed his previous operating system on his new computer, 
thus resolving the problems of program compatibility he found.

The Office licences permit installation and use of a previous version of the 
same product, so there may well be very large numbers of Office XP sales that 
actually reflect only the continuing use of Office 97 or indeed of Word 2 or 
6 and Excel 4 or 5 

just like the pharmaceutical industry that pushes 28000 drugs thro Dr's.
90% of which have no proven curative benefit whatsoever.
That is perhaps why we use them to ameliorate symptoms and control disease 
rather than to cure it.  Morphine doesn't cure disease, but it is a benefit 
many people have reason to be thankful for.

just very big business flexing its mussels
New Zealand green-lipped ones perhaps.  (probably good for hearts, and very 
yummy)

Ned Ludd and his followers resisted the loss of their jobs, one of the viral 
things about MS is that it creates jobs.  Which offers greater employment for 
low-grade IT technicians, an operating system and applications where 
everything is understandable, or one where the the details are hidden and 
only accessible to the senior members of the Guild; programs that work  
usually and evolve gradually under pressures from users, or programs that are 
flaky and driven by marketing hype?

One of the tasks for the OS/FS movement is to demonstrate an economic 
environment where those working "in IT" can expect to continue to do so, and 
to continue to benefit themselves, and since they have the same needs as the 
rest of us even if their livelihood is MS, to benefit their fellow-citizens 
and co-workers.

Time for Economists and Social Theorists
------------------------------------------------------------------
It exists, but the time is due for the economists and social theorists to get 
in the act, since the technology is alrgely done as evidenced by the shifting 
of MS from demonstrating that they can make pretty proprietary software (with 
some stunningly clever bits of integration technology among the dangerous 
half-baked crap) toward an effort to destroy any possibility of making 
software in other ways - they look as if they have run out of steam on the 
technology front (and their tactics must inevitably accelerate that since 
they arenot real innovators, and they aim to suppress or damage those who are 
and who would be producing the next wave of ideas for them to roughly copy 
and repackage.

Legislators and Judges
------------------------------------
MS have not recently at least really aimed at individual users, they have 
iamed at companies.  Now they are going beyond companies, to major national 
services and countries.

The OS/FS movement needs to make itself clear to MPs and they and the judges 
need to ensure they are making policies and interpreting laws for the general 
benefit.

Peru looks like a good start.
-- 
From one of the Linux desktops of Dr Adrian Midgley 
http://www.defoam.net/             

--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.


Lynx friendly