[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
On Monday 05 Jan 2004 8:11 pm, Tony Atkin wrote:
On Monday 05 January 2004 13:51, Neil Williams wrote:I can't resist. I only have one minor point. For accessibility reasons, I wonder if you'd consider darkening the font colorThanks, on reflection I agree it's too light.
The CSS Validator is now back online too - as expected, no errors or warnings. It's nice that even though you've had to write some horrible hacks to get around IE bugs (like "/"}"/" for no apparent reason), the CSS still validates. It's just like IE to introduce a bug and then follow it up with a second bug that allows the knowledgeable to trick IE into avoiding the first bug! "MS bod1: Umm, I know, let's not bother fixing that bug, what we'll do is quietly introduce a second bug that masks it. MS bod2: Yeah, we'll call it a workaround!" Gee whizz, what are they putting in the water in Seattle? (And how can we make sure 'they' keep doing it just for them?) -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.codehelp.co.uk/ http://www.dclug.org.uk/ http://www.isbn.org.uk/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/isbnsearch/ http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x8801094A28BCB3E3
Attachment:
pgp00060.pgp
Description: signature